Most of the legal theoreticians (uṣūlīs) have taken the narrational publicity as the prevalence and spread of relating traditions in books and collections of ḥadīth, according to which, the narrational publicity would not only not compensate the weakness of the sanad of the ḥadīth, but also would not be considered as among the causes and factors of preference in the contradiction of traditions, either; because the frequent relation of a ḥadīth in books is no reason for its authenticity. Many are the popular matters that are baseless and have no authenticity whatsoever!
Narrational publicity would not create a preference for the ḥadīth by itself and without accompanying practical publicity; rather, if a generally accepted ḥadīth is repudiated by the jurists, it is regarded as a sign for its weakness.
faghihi sadr, M., Sulṭānī, ., & Nāṣirī Muqaddam, . (2013). The Insufficiency of Narrational Publicity in the Field of Jurisprudence and Ḥadīth. Fiqh and Usul, 45(2), -. doi: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.9228
MLA
mohammad faghihi sadr; ‘Abbās‘alī Sulṭānī; Ḥusayn Nāṣirī Muqaddam. "The Insufficiency of Narrational Publicity in the Field of Jurisprudence and Ḥadīth". Fiqh and Usul, 45, 2, 2013, -. doi: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.9228
HARVARD
faghihi sadr, M., Sulṭānī, ., Nāṣirī Muqaddam, . (2013). 'The Insufficiency of Narrational Publicity in the Field of Jurisprudence and Ḥadīth', Fiqh and Usul, 45(2), pp. -. doi: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.9228
VANCOUVER
faghihi sadr, M., Sulṭānī, ., Nāṣirī Muqaddam, . The Insufficiency of Narrational Publicity in the Field of Jurisprudence and Ḥadīth. Fiqh and Usul, 2013; 45(2): -. doi: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.9228
)
Send comment about this article