An Analysis of the Jurisprudential Nature of Cryptocurrency Mining

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Hossein Ranjbar ¹
• Vahid Omidi ²
• Sorayya Javdan ³
• Ahmad Mohammadi ⁴

¹ MA Student, Department of Fiqh and Foundations of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Knowledge, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

² MA Student, Department of Fiqh and Foundations of Islamic Law, Research Institute of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution, Tehran, Iran

³ Level Four Seminary Student, Department of Fiqh and Foundations of Law, Jami’at Al-Nur Seminary, Shiraz, Iran

⁴ PhD Candidate, Department of Fiqh and Foundations of Islamic Law, Research Institute of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution, Tehran, Iran

10.22067/jfiqh.2022.75678.1322

Abstract

Newly emerged events in the world of technology call on jurisconsults to make extra efforts to align them with jurisprudential institutions and dos-and-don’ts and to try to regulate them. One of these technologies is the mining of cryptocurrencies. The present study analyzes the jurisprudential nature of cryptocurrency, using the descriptive-analytical method, in order to determine the ruling on cryptocurrency mining. It is concluded that cryptocurrency mining does not align with the hire contract in terms of the manner of offer (ījāb) and the conditions of contracting parties. It is also different in subject matter from the possession of ownerless property (ḥiyāzat-i mubāḥāt). This occures optional or non-optional while cryptocurrency mining is not. In other words, it is not the case that a number of cryptocurrencies exist for a person to extract using some tools, which would be considered as mining. Rather, the person is given a certain amount of cryptocurrency in exchange for the work they have done. Cryptocurrency mining is also different from the contract of gift (Hibbah), in terms of conditions of the offeror (mujib), the acceptor (qābil), and the act of taking possession (qabż). In the end, cryptocurrency mining can be aligned with the contract of Jiʿālah ʿām. However, even in this case, considering cryptocurrency as Jiʿālah does not legitimize the act. There are several other issues such as the lack of value, the incompetent trades of mining (the state of being Safahī), etc., which may be analyzed in future research.

Keywords

• cryptocurrency mining
• jurisprudential nature
• hire contract
• Donation with consideration (Hibbah-i Maʿvaż)
• possession of ownerless propoerty (ḥiyāzat-i mubāḥāt)
• Jiʿālah

Main Subjects

• Civil jurisprudence

---

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

References

Ākhūnd Khurāsānī, Muḥammad Kāẓim ibn Ḥusayn. Ḥāshīya al-Makāsib.   Tehran::Vizārat-i Farhang va Irshād Islāmī, 1986/1406.

ʿAllāmah Ḥillī, Ḥasan  ibn Yūsuf. Qawāʾid al-Aḥkām fī Maʿrifa al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī. 1993/1413.

ʿAllāmah Ḥillī, Ḥasan  ibn Yūsuf. Sharḥ Tabṣira al-Mutaʿallimīn. Tarjumah va Sharḥ ʿAlī Muḥammadī. s.l. s.n. s.d.

ʿAllāmah Ḥillī, Ḥasan  ibn Yūsuf. Tabṣira al-Mutaʿallimīn fī Aḥkām al-Dīn. Tehran: Mūʾassisah-yi Chāp va Nashr Vābastih bi Vizārat-i Farhang va Irshād Islāmī. 1991/1411.

ʿAllāmah Ḥillī, Ḥasan  ibn Yūsuf. Tadhkara al-Fuqahāʾ. Qum: Āl al-Bayt(AS). 1994/1414.

Ḥillī, Jaʻfar ibn Ḥasan. Īḍāḥ Fawāʾid fī Sharḥ Mushkilāt al-Qawāʿid. Qum: Ismāʻīlīyān. 1967/1387.

Ḥusaynī ʻĀmulī, Muḥammad Javād ibn Muḥammad. Miftāḥ al-Karāmah fī Sharḥ Qawāʿid ʿAllāma. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1998/1419.

Khiradmand, Muḥsin. “Barrisī Fiqhī  Istikhrāj va Mubādilih-yi Ramz Arz-hā bā Tamarkuz bar Shabakih Bitcoin”, Majallih-yi Maʿrifat Iqtiṣād Islāmī. yr. 10, no. 2, spring and summer  2020/1398, 78-93.

Khūʾī, Abū al-Qāsim. al-Mustanad fī Sharḥ al-ʿUrwa  al-Wuthqā.  Muqarr Murtaḍā Burūjirdī. s.l. s.n. s.d.

Khūʾī, Abū al-Qāsim. Minhāj al-Ṣāliḥīn. Qum: Madīnah al-ʻIlm. 1990/1410.

Khumaynī, Rūḥ Allāḥ. Kitāb-i al-Bayʿ. Tehran: Mūʾassisah-yi Tanẓīm va Nashr-i Āsār-i  Imām Khumaynī. 2000/1421.

Khumaynī, Rūḥ Allāḥ. Taḥrīr al-Wasīlah. Qum: Dār al-ʻIlm. s.d.

Khumaynī, Rūḥ Allāḥ. Taḥrīr al-Wasīlah. Translated by ʿAlī  Islāmī. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 2004/1425.

Khuwānsārī, Muḥammad. al-Ḥāshīya al-Thānīya ʿalā al-Makāsib  s.l. s.n. s.d.

Muḥaqqiq Dāmād, Sayyid Muṣṭafā. Qawāʾid Fiqh. Tehran: Markaz-i Nashr-i ʿUlum Islāmī. 1986/1406.

Muḥaqqiq Ḥillī. Jaʻfar ibn Ḥasan. Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām fī Masāʾil al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām. Qum: Ismāʻīlīyān.  1988/1408.

Muḥaqqiq Karakī, ʿAlī ibn Ḥusayn. Jāmiʿal-Maqāṣid fī Sharḥ al-Qawāʾid. Qum: Āl al-Bayt(AS). 1994/1414.

Muqaddas Ardabīlī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. Majmaʻ al-Fāʾida wa al-Burhān fī Sharḥ Irshād al-Adhhān. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī. 1983/1403.

Muṣṭafāwī, Muḥammad Kāẓim. Miʾat Qāʿidah Fiqhīyah. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī. 2000/1421.

Navābpūr, ʻAlī Riżā, Aḥmad ʻAlī Yūsufī, Muḥammad Ṭālibī. “Tahlīl-i Fiqhī Kārkird-hā-yi Pūl-hā-yi Ramznigārī Shudih Murid Muṭāliʻih  Bitcoin”. Faṣlnāmih-yi Iqtiṣād Islāmī. yr. 18, no. 72, winter 2019/1397, 213-243.

Ṣāḥib Jawāhir, Muḥammad Ḥasan ibn Bāqir. Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Sharḥ Sharāyʿ al-Islām.  Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Tūrāth al-ʻArabī. 1984/1404.

Shahīd Awwal, Muḥammad ibn Makkī. al-Lumʿa al-Dimashqīya fī Fiqh al-Imāmīya. Beirut:  Dār al-Turāth; Dār al-Islāmīya, 1990/1410.

Shahīd Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ʿAlī.  Masālik al-Afhām ilā Tanqīḥ Sharāʾiʿal-Islām. Qum: Mūʾassisa al-Maʿārif  al-Islāmīyya. 1993/1413.

Shahīd Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ʿAlī. al-Rawḍa al-Bahīya fī Sharḥ al-Lumʿah al-Dimashqīyah, Ḥāshīyih Muḥammad Kalāntar. Qum: Kitābfurūshī Dāwarī, 1990/1410.

Sulaymānī, Muḥammad Mahdī, Ḥāmid Sulṭānīnizhād, Mahdī Pūr Muṭahar. “Barrisī Fiqhī  Pūl Majāzī”, Dū Faṣlnāmih-yi ʻIlmī Pazhūhīsh Taḥqīqāt  Mālī Islāmī. yr. 6, no. 2, spring and summer  2018/1396, 36-58.

Ṭabāṭabāyī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. Rīyāḍ Masāʾil. Qum: Āl al-Bayt(AS). 1997/1418.

Ṭāhirī, Ḥabīb Allāḥ. Ḥuqūq-i Madanī. Qum: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī. 1997/1418.