Investigating the jurisprudential nature of currency cryptography

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Hosein Ranjbar ¹
• Vahid Omidi ²
• Soraiia Javidan ³
• ahmad mohammadi ⁴

¹ Senior student of Qom University of Religions and Religions

² Senior student of Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute

³ Fourth level student of Al-Noor Shiraz seminary

⁴ Doctoral student of Imam Khomeini (RA) and Revolution Research Institute

10.22067/jfiqh.2022.75678.1322

Abstract

In the present study, the jurisprudential nature of currency cryptography was investigated analytically. Surveys show; Currency mining is not a lease because although it is possible to define, exchange and act as a cryptocurrency mining is similar to renting, but in the terms of the contract, the requirements and conditions of the tenant do not apply. The permissibility of extracting the cryptocurrency is also excluded because, despite the conformity of intention, the conditions of the agent and the condition of authenticity and stewardship, the two are thematically different; Possession occurs only in two main and transverse forms, none of which corresponds to the extraction of currency codes, and it is not the case that there are a number of currency codes that a person uses to take them as a tool, except for mining, but for work that Has done, some currency code is given to him.The extraction of the cryptocurrency with the gift can be matched in the demand and acceptance, exchange and action, but in nature, the cause and the receivable are incompatible with each other. Currency mining is applicable to general forgery; Because in all pillars; Requirement and acceptance, forgery, agent and forgery of currency cryptography are matched with forgery.

Keywords

• Extraction
• currency code
• jurisprudential nature
• rent
• exchange rate
• possession of permissibility
• forgery

Main Subjects

• Civil jurisprudence

---